Imagine a leadership team announcing:
“From today, we are going to trust each other.”
It sounds slightly absurd.
Yet organisations attempt something remarkably similar all the time.
Trust appears in values.
It appears in leadership programmes.
It appears in employee surveys and culture initiatives.
People are encouraged to speak openly, collaborate more freely and challenge constructively.
But there is a problem.
Trust cannot be instructed.
Because ultimately trust involves a choice.
We decide whether to speak.
Whether to believe.
Whether to challenge.
Whether to admit that we don’t know.
Whether to expose an idea before it is fully formed.
Whether to tell someone what we actually think rather than what we believe they want to hear.
And those choices are influenced by what happened the last time we made them.
Consider the employee who is repeatedly told:
“We want people to challenge us.”
Eventually they do.
Perhaps they question a decision in a meeting.
What happens next matters far more than the statement encouraging them to speak.
They may be listened to.
Their contribution may be explored.
Their challenge may even change the decision.
Or the room may become uncomfortable.
The conversation may quickly move on.
Their manager may later explain why raising it publicly was “unhelpful”.
No policy needs to change.
No announcement needs to be made.
But a lesson has been learned.
Next time that person reaches the same moment, they have another choice to make.
And perhaps this time they remain silent.
Multiply that experience across hundreds or thousands of people and something we eventually call culture begins to emerge.
This is one reason I have increasingly come to see culture as an outcome rather than a starting point.
Behind it are people continuously making choices about how they respond to one another.
Some intentional.
Some automatic.
Some helpful.
Some less so.
Trust therefore cannot simply be demanded by leadership.
Nor can responsibility, openness or collaboration.
An organisation can create conditions that make those behaviours more likely.
But ultimately people still have to choose them.
Which raises an interesting question.
When organisations say they want more trust, perhaps the deeper question is not:
How do we make people trust each other?
Perhaps it is:
What happens here when someone chooses to trust?
The answer may tell us rather more about the organisation than any value statement ever could.
Related Articles: