Human Agency and Innovation: Why the Best Ideas Are Sometimes Never Spoken

Organisations frequently say they want innovation.

They encourage people to challenge assumptions, bring forward ideas and think differently.

Yet some of the most valuable ideas in an organisation may never be heard.

Not because someone rejected them.

Not because they were discussed and found wanting.

But because they were filtered out before they were ever spoken.

The Idea That Was Never Spoken

Imagine someone sitting in a meeting.

They hear a proposal and immediately see a problem with it. Or perhaps they see another possibility.

For a moment, there is a thought:

There might be a better way.

Then something else happens.

They won’t listen.

We’ve tried that before.

That’s not how we do things here.

I don’t want to look foolish.

The person presenting this is more senior than me.

It’s probably not worth saying anything.

And so they remain silent.

From the outside, nothing happened.

But internally, a great deal happened.

A thought arose. It passed through a series of filters shaped by previous experience, assumptions, relationships, hierarchy, confidence, fear and expectation.

And somewhere in that process, the idea disappeared.

Silence is also a response

We tend to think of behaviour as something we can observe.

What someone said.

What someone did.

How someone reacted.

But choosing not to act — or not to speak — is also a response.

The more interesting question is whether it was actually chosen.

Was remaining silent a considered decision?

Or was it the automatic consequence of an internal filtering process the individual barely noticed?

There is an important distinction.

Someone may listen, consider the circumstances and intentionally decide that this isn’t the right moment to speak.

That is a choice.

But someone else may experience an almost instantaneous internal process that prevents them from speaking without ever consciously recognising that another response was available.

The outward behaviour looks identical.

Both people remain silent.

But in terms of Human Agency, something very different has happened.

Where innovation really begins

We often talk about innovation as though it begins with ideas.

Perhaps it begins slightly earlier.

It begins with our ability to recognise what is happening inside us before we respond.

Human Agency exists in that small but enormously important space between what happens to us and what we subsequently choose to do.

The greater our awareness of the assumptions, experiences and automatic responses influencing us, the greater our opportunity to make an intentional choice.

That doesn’t mean always challenging.

It doesn’t mean always speaking.

And it certainly doesn’t mean that every unconventional idea is a good one.

It means recognising that a choice exists.

Because organisations cannot benefit from ideas that never become visible.

And sometimes the idea that could change an organisation never meets resistance at all.

It is filtered out before it is ever spoken.

Perhaps, therefore, when someone says nothing, there is a question worth asking:

Was silence an intentional response?

Or did the decision happen before they realised there was one to make?

That is one of the places where Human Agency begins.


If you’d like to explore these ideas further, I’ve written a paper called Human Agency that examines the subject in much greater depth. It’s available as a free download from my website.

Related Articles:

How Human Agency Shapes Organisational Performance Before Results Appear

Why Human Agency Is the Foundation of Leadership

Paper on Human Agency